LIFE—PART III
±±±DISCLAIMER±±±
I wrote this a long while back, and there were some pictures BUT I DONT’T KNOW WHERE THEY ARE. The following might be boring, but who reads this shit anyway?
±±±±±±±±±±±±±±
Today I just got back from seeing the Gerhard Richter exhibition at that Tate place. There’s so much good stuff on at the moment—well, I say that but I’ve only been to Grayson Perry and this in the last few months, so what do I know?
You get the impression from the show, and also from the excellent video at the end of it, that Richter has spent his whole career exploring aesthetic and artistic choices that interest him. Shall I paint it this way or this way? Well, let’s just try it and see how it comes out. He doesn’t seem precious about the work that he creates. That’s not to say that he just churns it out without a thought given to how it’s executed, but that he’s not afraid to try things and add to his repertoire. So many of the works are responses, both personal and professional—sometimes to experiences, news events or other pieces of work; others seem like tests. But the whole show makes this wonderful fabric of experimentation and optimism, which is weird, given the sometimes quite morbid subject matter. And some of the experiments are less successful than others, but that’s all part of it.
There were two huge highlights for me in this show, which weirdly weren’t paintings but were things that solidified thoughts I’ve been having lately, I mean, I’m vain and these two things made me feel like a genius, ok?
Firstly, there a painting of him and this old man. It’s probably the least exciting painting in the entire show, to look at at least. The caption tells us that this bloke is Benjamin Buchloh, a pretty famous art historian apparently, who has been writing about Richter’s work since the 70s. So far, so unremarkable. But then in the film there’s a scene in which Serota is taking Richter for a final pass of the show before it opens, and he pauses in front of this particular painting and says ‘ah, my teacher’. That was a lovely moment. Buchloh has been contextualising Richter’s work for him for the past 40 years, giving it meaning, teaching Richter what it means and where it stands in the larger whole. Amazing. This just frees him up to explore and experiment even more, and have someone help him frame it, give it meaning. Teamwork. I really wonder how influential Buchloh has been on shaping Richter’s work. It’s great to have those relationships, those sounding boards for open ended work.
The other thing he said in this video was that he’s interested in painting because it shows what isn’t there. It takes a space or object or whatever, and forces you to look at it. It reframes, recontextualises, then there you are, looking and noticing in a way that you never looked at this thing before. It’s like a big magnifying glass or amplifier, and as a result you ask yourself what is interesting about this thing, and you start filling in the blanks, noticing what isn’t there. That was nice. Man, there was so MUCH nice stuff in this exhibition that I might have to try to write up some DAMN NOTES or something or whatever yeah? LATOR.









